Is your remote workforce still able to securely access the information they need to do their jobs? Most organizations have technology such as VPN in place to enable employees to stay connected while working from home. But you should still keep in mind the “least privilege” principle, allowing employees only enough access to perform their required job.
Has segregation of duties (SOD) been compromised? Ordinarily, your internal controls mitigate risk by clearly defining which individuals or roles are allowed to perform certain duties. But workforce changes or reductions—not to mention possible employee health issues—can create ambiguity around these guardrails. After analyzing your organization’s SOD, you might discover that you need to add controls to compensate for these uncertainties. If you don’t have time to do an SOD analysis, err on the side of caution, especially if fraud risk is high.
Have you recently terminated or reassigned resources? If you’ve had workforce reassignments or reductions, have you appropriately modified or removed access to corporate networks and confidential information? Timely removal of terminated employees can be a challenge even in the best of times; now it’s critical to ensure this is done right.
Drastic changes in daily life around the globe have disrupted typical patterns of supply and demand. Uncertain times call for uncertain measures. However, you should consider your risk appetite and how much your organization is willing to “bend the rules” to minimize the disruption caused by COVID-19.
Assess where you can flex with minimal risk vs. where you can’t.
Has a rapid change in demand increased pressure to process a high volume of transactions? In the absence of formal processes and procedures, there’s an increased risk that employees will skip existing controls. For example, in the rush to respond to sudden demand fluctuations, they might take shortcuts on customer acceptance or credit checks. Or, there could be workarounds on new business profitability analyses or revenue recognition that’s not GAAP-compliant. Assess where you can flex with minimal risk (operational internal policies and procedures) vs. where you can’t (GAAP and other regulatory requirements).
Along similar lines, has a surge in demand put pressure on your supply chains? Rapid increases in sourcing requirements might lead to lax vendor due diligence as well as bypassing procure-to-pay processes. Assess where you can afford to be flexible on proper bidding procedures in the interest of time vs. what’s unacceptable—such as unauthorized or abusive spending.
The temporary halt to business-as-usual could have weakened your usual lines of defense as normal roles and responsibilities shift and processes adapt.
How is responsibility for risk management being impacted? Redeployment, reduction or reallocation of human resources has undoubtedly increased your exposure to new risks and control gaps. It’s essential to anticipate these changing risk dynamics so that you can respond appropriately.
Consider a RACI chart to document changes in transaction authorizations and risk monitoring.
For a decentralized organization, this could be an unknown. Consider a RACI chart—showing who’s Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed—to document key changes in transaction authorizations and risk monitoring and identify the gaps.
These are just a few of the scenarios where an enhanced risk and controls mindset will enable you to respond to the current crisis while maintaining vital internal controls. Technology can provide even greater assurance that you’re addressing risks that temporarily exceed your organization’s risk tolerance and identify gaps that warrant immediate control remediation.
If you need extra support, whether COVID-related or not, please reach out. Our experienced Risk & Compliance experts can provide remote support so that internal audit and compliance issues don’t have to take a back seat while you’re waiting to get back to the office.